Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | BCMR | CY2014 | BC 2014 01321
Original file (BC 2014 01321.txt) Auto-classification: Denied
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS

IN THE MATTER OF: 			DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2014-01321
 					COUNSEL:  NONE
					HEARING DESIRED:  NO 


APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT:

He be awarded the following awards:

1.  Purple Heart (PH).

2.  Prisoner of War Medal (PWM).  (Will be administratively 
corrected)

3.  The 389th Bombardment Group Distinguished Unit Citation 
(DUC). (Will be administratively corrected for award of the 
Presidential Unit Citation, formerly the DUC)

4.  Other awards he be may be entitled to.  


APPLICANT CONTENDS THAT:

On 11 Apr 44, he was a top turret gunner on a B-24 aircraft that 
was shot down.  He got out of the plane and parachuted onto 
German soil.  His captors took him to a hospital where he was 
treated for severe burns on his head, face and hands.  The 
injuries were from the fire on the plane going through his 
turret position.  His WD-AGO Form 53-55, Enlisted Record and 
Report of Separation Honorable Discharge, Item 34, Wounds 
Received in Action, reflects “11 Apr 44 Germany.”  Item 55, 
Remarks, reflects “Prisoner of War from 11 Apr 44 to 2 May 45 in 
Germany.” 

Upon release from the hospital, he was transported to Stalag 17B 
Prisoner of War (POW) Camp where he remained for 13 months until 
5 May 45 when liberated by U.S. Armed Forces.

At the end of WWII, he was liberated from his POW camp and sent 
back to the U.S. by ship and discharged shortly thereafter.  No 
one was waiting around for commendations or awards and thus no 
medals were awarded upon discharge. 

The applicant provides no rationale as to why the Board should 
consider it in the interest of justice to consider his untimely 
application.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit A.

STATEMENT OF FACTS:

The applicant was a member of the Army Air Corps from 6 Jan 
43 to 11 Jun 45.

His WD-AGO Form 53-55, Item 34, reflects “11 Apr 44 Germany.”  
Item 55, reflects “Prisoner of War from 11 Apr 44 to 2 May 45 in 
Germany.” 

The PH is awarded to members of the United States Armed Forces 
who have been wounded, killed or who have died or may hereafter 
die of wounds received in action against an enemy of the United 
States or opposing force as a result of an act of any such enemy 
or opposing armed force, an international terrorist attack or 
during military operations while serving as part of a peace 
keeping force.  A wound for which the award is made must have 
required treatment, not merely examination, by a medical 
officer.  Additionally, treatment of the wound shall be 
documented in the service member’s medical record.  Award of the 
PH may be made for wounds treated by a medical professional 
other than a medical officer, provided a medical officer 
includes a statement in the Service member’s medical record that 
the extent of the wounds were such that they would have required 
treatment by a medical officer if one had been available to 
treat them.  


AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

AFPC/DPSID recommends denial of the applicant’s request for 
award of the PH. DPSID was unable to locate a signed 
certificate, special order or any other official documentation 
verifying the applicant was recommended for or awarded the PH.  
While the applicant has provided a detailed account of how the 
injury occurred, he has not provided an eyewitness statement or 
medical documentation substantiating the injury was received and 
treated.  While it is highly unlikely treatment for an injury 
would have been documented by a medical professional in a POW 
camp, no medical documentation post internment was provided or 
located such as a physical upon separation.  The applicant’s WD-
AGO 53-55 reflects the applicant received wounds in action on 
11 Apr 44.  While this states the applicant received the injury, 
this entry on its own is not conclusive evidence that the injury 
received on 11 Apr 44 was due to enemy action.   To grant relief 
would be contrary to the criteria established by DoDM 1348.33, 
Manual of Military Decorations and Awards, the Secretary of the 
Air Force and the Chief of Staff.

The PH Review Board has the authority (on behalf of the 
Secretary of the Air Force), to determine a veteran’s award of 
the PH.  Each request is considered based on the policies and 
criteria in use at the time the veteran was injured, and the 
determination is dependent on the documentary evidence 
presented.  In order to present a request to the PH Review 
Board, a detailed personal account of the circumstances 
surrounding the injury, medical documentation to substantiate 
medical treatment was received and if possible, an eyewitness 
account from an individual who saw the applicant injured.  The 
applicant’s request was not boarded by the PH Review Board due 
to lacking documentation to be considered.

Based on a review of the applicant’s official military personnel 
record, DPSID was able to determine the applicant should have 
been awarded the American Campaign Medal (ACM), World War II 
Victory Medal (WWIIVM), Good Conduct Medal (GCM), Prisoner of 
War Medal (PWM) and the Presidential Unit Citation (PUC).  Upon 
the final decision of the Board, the applicant’s records will be 
administratively corrected by AFPC/DPSOR to reflect the awards.   

A complete copy of the DPSID evaluation is at Exhibit C.


APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION:

The applicant’s podiatrist provides a letter attesting to an x-
ray of the applicant’s left ankle which has the presence of 
shrapnel.  Additional medical documentation from the clinic 
where he was a patient over the years is forthcoming and will be 
provided.

They were able to locate a copy of the MACR 3781 and within the 
report is a casualty questionnaire from a crew member who said 
the applicant was “burnt about the face.”   Another crew member 
who they met a few years back commented to the applicant that he 
did not recognize him because he only remembered him with a 
severely burned face and hands the last time he saw him in 1944.  

The applicant’s complete submission, with attachments, is at 
Exhibit E.  


THE BOARD CONCLUDES THAT:

1.  The applicant has exhausted all remedies provided by 
existing law or regulations.

2.  The application was not timely filed; however, it is in the 
interest of justice to excuse the failure to timely file.

3.  Insufficient relevant evidence has been presented to 
demonstrate the existence of an error or injustice.  After 
thoroughly reviewing the evidence of record and the letter from 
the applicant’s podiatrist we are not persuaded the applicant 
should be awarded the PH.  While the evidence reflects the 
applicant received wounds in action on 11 Apr 44, we do not find 
the evidence submitted sufficient to determine the applicant 
suffered an injury as a result of the act of an enemy.  Should 
the applicant provide an eyewitness statement from someone who 
witnessed the circumstances surrounding his injury, we would be 
willing to reconsider his request.  The applicant’s personal 
sacrifice and unselfish service to his country is noted and our 
decision in no way lessens our regard for his service; however, 
without documentation to substantiate his injury was caused by 
enemy action, we are unable to verify his entitlement to the PH.  
Therefore, aside from the aforementioned administrative 
corrections for award of the ACM, WWIIVM, GCM, PWM and the PUC, 
we find no basis to recommend granting the additional relief 
sought in this application.


THE BOARD DETERMINES THAT:

The applicant be notified the evidence presented did not 
demonstrate the existence of material error or injustice; the 
application was denied without a personal appearance; and the 
application will only be reconsidered upon the submission of 
newly discovered relevant evidence not considered with this 
application.


The following members of the Board considered AFBCMR Docket 
Number BC-2014-01321 in Executive Session on 26 Feb 15 under the 
provisions of AFI 36-2603:

	 , Panel Chair
	 , Member
	 , Member

The following documentary evidence was considered:

	Exhibit A.  DD Form 149, dated 26 Mar 14, w/atchs.
	Exhibit B.  Applicant's Master Personnel Records.
	Exhibit C.  Memorandum, AFPC/DPSID, dated 7 Jul 14.
 	Exhibit D.  Letter, SAF/MRBR, dated 18 Dec 14.
	Exhibit E.  Letter, Applicant, dated 14 Jan 15, w/atchs.  

Similar Decisions

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2013-01539

    Original file (BC-2013-01539.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letter prepared by the Air Force office of primary responsibility, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating there is no evidence of an error or an injustice. While the deceased member was a POW from 31 Jan 45 to 29 Apr 45, the applicant did not submit documentation which verifies the deceased...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2002 | BC 2002 01403

    Original file (BC 2002 01403.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2002-01403 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His award of the Silver Star (SS) be upgraded to the Medal of Honor (MoH) for his actions on 26 Nov 43. According to documentation provided by the applicant, on 11 Jan 44, he was wounded in action. A review of the applicant’s records revealed that he should have been awarded the Prisoner of War Medal (PWM),...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 03990

    Original file (BC 2013 03990.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    According to DD Form 2510, POW Medal Application/Information, dated 22 Jun 88; the applicant was captured on 6 Mar 44 and held a POW until 29 Apr 45. He did not provide, nor could it be located in his official personnel records, medical documentation supporting his request more contemporary with the event than 2 years and 10 months after the alleged wounding. The PH Review Board has the authority (on behalf of the Secretary of the Air Force (SECAF)), to determine a veteran's award of the PH.

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC 2013 05128

    Original file (BC 2013 05128.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2013-05128 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NO APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Distinguished Flying Cross (DFC). The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are described in the letters prepared by the Air Force offices of primary responsibility (OPR), which are attached at Exhibits C, D and E. AIR FORCE EVALUATION: AFPC/DPSID recommends denial indicating...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-01640

    Original file (BC-2011-01640.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    AR 600-45.C4 permits award of the PH for frostbite for personnel “actually engaged in combat.” PL 104-106, dated 10 Feb 96, entitled former POWs to receive a PH for wounds suffered as a POW. ________________________________________________________________ THE BOARD RECOMMENDS THAT: The pertinent military records of the Department of the Air Force relating to the APPLICANT, be corrected to show that he was awarded the Purple Heart Medal, for wounds received as a direct result of enemy action...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2011 | BC-2011-00025

    Original file (BC-2011-00025.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT'S REVIEW OF AIR FORCE EVALUATION: On 25 Mar 11, a copy of the Air Force evaluation was forwarded to the applicant for review and comment within 30 days. To date, a response has not been received (Exhibit C). _________________________________________________________________ The following members of the Board considered Docket Number BC-2011-00025 in Executive Session on 9 Jun 11, under the provisions of AFI...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2006 | BC-2005-01738

    Original file (BC-2005-01738.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2005-01738 INDEX CODE: 107.00 (Member/Uncle) COUNSEL: None (Applicant/Nephew) 063-14-5768 HEARING DESIRED: Yes MANDATORY CASE COMPLETION DATE: 29 NOV 06 _________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: His uncle be awarded the Silver Star (SS) [or some other fitting award - See Exhibit E] for heroic actions performed in World War II...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2013 | BC-2012-05293

    Original file (BC-2012-05293.txt) Auto-classification: Approved

    RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS AIR FORCE BOARD FOR CORRECTION OF MILITARY RECORDS IN THE MATTER OF: DOCKET NUMBER: BC-2012-05293 COUNSEL: NONE HEARING DESIRED: NOT INDICATED ________________________________________________________________ APPLICANT REQUESTS THAT: He be awarded the Purple Heart (PH). This could result in an injustice to the applicant if the Purple Heart Review Board made a decision without allowing the applicant an opportunity to provide the missing documentation. Based on their...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2007 | BC-2007-00263

    Original file (BC-2007-00263.doc) Auto-classification: Denied

    ___________________________________________________________________ AIR FORCE EVALUATION: HQ AFPC/DPPPR reviewed this application and recommended denial, stating, in part, that applicant’s plane was shot down on 23 Mar 44, over Brunswick, Germany, and he was held as a POW from 23 Mar 44 to 29 Apr 45. His DD Form 214, states no wounds received in action. We therefore agree with the opinion and recommendation of the Air Force office of primary responsibility and adopt its rationale as the...

  • AF | BCMR | CY2010 | BC-2010-04050

    Original file (BC-2010-04050.txt) Auto-classification: Denied

    On 15 Jul 11, AFPC/DPSIDRA notified the applicant of their determination of his entitlement to the Prisoner of War (POW) Medal, the American Campaign Medal (ACM), and the World War II Victor Medal (WWIIVM) and corrected his records administratively. The remaining relevant facts pertaining to this application are contained in the letter prepared by the appropriate office of the Air Force, which is attached at Exhibit C. ________________________________________________________________ AIR...